This blog is hosted on Ideas on EuropeIdeas on Europe Avatar

Boris Johnson’s big blunder

London Mayor Boris Johnson's big blunder

The mayor of one of the world’s most pro EU capital cities has announced that he wants Britain to leave the European Union.

Boris Johnson, MP and London’s Mayor, made his announcement after apparently agonising over the decision for hours and following the pleas of Prime Minister, David Cameron, for him not to abandon the government’s position for Britain to remain in the EU.

Boris’s view is apparently clear: in the event of Britain leaving the EU, he will be in ‘pole position’ to see-off David Cameron and rival, Chancellor George Osborne, and grab his long coveted job of Prime Minister of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

From his comments today, it seems that his strategy on a ‘Leave’ victory in the referendum would then be to negotiate a new and ‘better’ deal with the European Union.

My view? It’s an enormous gamble by Mr Johnson and one he may live to regret for the rest of his life.

Over the next four months, Britain and Britons are going to be exposed for the first time to fuller facts about the European Union, and all the hype and misinformation that we’ve been fed for years will be robustly challenged and corrected.

The country will go from blissful ignorance about the functioning and benefits of the European Union, to becoming global experts.

We’ve seen from past referenda campaigns in other European countries that such increased knowledge usually results in the populace becoming much more in favour of EU membership.

The bookies currently foresee a referendum victory for Britain to ‘remain’ in the EU – and unlike pollsters, bookmakers are more usually accurate at predictions.

It seems Boris has backed the wrong side. No doubt he’ll be able to brush that off with his usual bluster and buffoonery when the referendum results are announced on 24 June that Britain has voted to ‘Remain’ in the EU.

But just say Britain votes to ‘Leave’ the EU, and Boris cycles over to 10 Downing Street to take up his new position as Prime Minister. If he then tries to negotiate a ‘new deal’ with the EU, he will almost certainly be sent back home with a severe haircut.

Contrary to the view of Brexiters, EU leaders are not so desperate to keep Britain in the European club, otherwise they would have given Mr Cameron everything he demanded. They didn’t.

The foundational principles of the EU are much more important than the vexatious demands of one recalcitrant EU member, let alone an ex-member.

And if Britain leaves the European Union, what will happen to our Union of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland?

Almost certainly, Scotland would immediately demand a referendum to leave the United Kingdom and apply to join the European Union as an independent state. It’s quite possible that Wales and Northern Ireland, which are both much more pro-EU than England, could follow.

Then Boris would be Prime Minister only of Little England. Yes, he might ‘get his country back’, but it could be only one country out of four. He’d be ‘king’ of a much smaller castle; no longer an island state and leading EU member, but surrounded and sandwiched by EU member-states over which he’d have no say or influence.

So the referendum exercise – if ‘Leave’ wins as Boris Johnson hopes – could result in not ‘getting our country back’ but instead losing our United Kingdom of countries.

The European Union would still exist, without England, but possibly with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland as EU members.

Such a scenario is not beyond the realms of possibility. Boris could become leader of a country – and a Tory party – literally cut in half.

Boris has blundered. He should have shown loyalty to his Prime Minister and backed the ‘Remain’ campaign, in the unselfish interests of his party, the countries of the United Kingdom, and the capital city which he represents as Mayor.

* Join the discussion about this article on Facebook.


Other stories by Jon Danzig:

To follow my stories please like my Facebook page: Jon Danzig Writes


• Comments are welcome – but please read: ‘Debate, don’t hate’

• Share and join the discussions about this article on Facebook and Twitter:

→ Boris’s big blunder – please shareEU: BORIS JOHNSON’S BID TO LEAVE THEN LEADThe mayor of one of the world’s most…

Posted by Jon Danzig on Monday, 22 February 2016



4 Responses to Boris Johnson’s big blunder

  1. avatar Roy Jacobs says:

    I think you misread this Jon.

    Option 1 Brexit: neither the PM or Osborne could credibly expect to lead negotiations with the EU following Article 50 being invoked. So Boris Johnson walks into No 10 practically unopposed.

    Option 2 Remain: Cameron stays in position and steps down a year before the next General Election.
    The Parliamentary Conservative Party select 2 prospective candidates, as both the Parliamentary Party and overwhelmingly the Conservative Membership are Eurosceptic ( in the case of the membership Europhobic) at least one candidate would need to have actively campaigned for Brexit, so in all likelihood either Johnson or Davies if he put himself forward.

    In option 2 I think the Eurosceptic candidate is put in place by the membership still very angry at having lost the Referendum.

    Its hard to see Boris Johnson losing either way.

  2. avatar Jon Danzig says:

    Well, at least Boris’s dad agrees with me…

    Boris Johnson’s Brexit Decision ‘Career Ending,’ According To His Father Stanley

    Let’s see on 24 June 2016 if I am right. I look forward to hearing from you again then…

  3. avatar Roy Jacobs says:

    I heard the interview with his father, what he was saying is that Boris was not choosing to back Brexit on the grounds of advancement, but from objective disagreements with the terms negotiated by the PM.

    I think that’s half true, and as his father is campaigning for Remain, he was put in a rather awkward position.

  4. avatar Roy Jacobs says:

    It was interesting listening to 2 business people debating EU membership on the BBC News just now Jon.

    One was a businessman with offices in 80 countries, across the EU and worldwide who noted that his non EU branches were doing very well, less so those in the EU. He saw no problems at all with Brexit, indeed he thought that unshackled from tiresome regulations they might prosper.

    The second, a business woman selling sex toys, was certain that EU membership was vital to her business, until it was pointed out that she had no EU companies, her turnover into the EU was non existent and her only markets outside the UK were the US and Japan.

    If the pro EU campaign are going to put up business people for press interviews, it would help if they actually had a business presence in the EU.

    Even the EU funded BBC struggle to manage interviews like that.

UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors.