Britain has more job vacancies than can be filled by the native workforce. That, in a nutshell, is why we need migrants.
The country has a chronic skills shortage and without migrants helping to fill that gap, Britain – and Britons – would be poorer.
Britain now has more people at work than ever before. We also have a record number of job openings – around 755,000 vacancies this autumn alone. It’s no wonder that in line with that, immigration from the rest of Europe is also at a record high.
Why? Because migrants mostly come to Britain for jobs, and if there were not so many jobs, there would be little reason to come here, and therefore, not so many migrants.
Of course, none of this is any consolation to the 1.6 million people currently unemployed. But unfortunately, many of the unemployed do not have the skills now needed by employers. Britain, of course, should be spending billions in upskilling our workers, and especially the unemployed.
Similarly, we shouldn’t blame migrants that parts of the country lack sufficient schools, hospitals, homes, or that many are struggling on zero-hour contracts. For that, we should blame our political masters.
It’s too easy for the government to scapegoat migrants for our problems, when the fact is that without migrants, the country would be poorer. If all migrants went home, we wouldn’t have more schools, hospitals and homes. We would simply have a bigger shortage of teachers, doctors, nurses and builders.
In the meantime, British businesses are hungry for more skilled workers. Without them, our economy would stagnate and die. That, actually, is one way to stem the flow of migration to Britain – to trash our economy. But who would seriously advocate such a policy?
Whilst still a member of the European Union, Britain has record numbers at work, record numbers of vacancies, and unemployment at an 11-year-low of 4.8%. Helping to propel that recovery are EU migrants, most of whom are in gainful employment, working hard, paying taxes and spending most of their earnings here, in Britain.
And yet, Britain still doesn’t have enough workers to fill the profound skills gap the country is facing.
Yes, of course, we should be training more people.
But in the meantime, the government has compiled a long list of skills the country needs – now, urgently. It’s called the UK Shortage Occupation List. We need, for example:
Scientists, such as geologists; nuclear medicine experts; mechanical engineers, such as for the oil and gas industries; electronic engineers for the motoring industry; software developers for 2D/3D animation; contaminated land specialists; medical practitioners, such as psychiatrists, anaesthetics and radiographers; specialist intensive care nurses; maths and science teachers; social workers; contemporary dancers; orchestral musicians; overhead lines workers; skilled chefs..
..And the list goes on and on. Skilled workers that the country needs now.
In addition, many farms, catering establishments, hotels, care homes and builders categorically state that they simply could not survive, let alone thrive, without EU migrants. Not because they are cheaper (can you really find a cheap Polish plumber these days?). No. It’s because these establishments have more vacancies to fill than British people either can or want to fill.
Eurosceptics say they are not against migration, but want the country to have fewer migrants, and to be able to choose who can come here, based on the skills needed. And they don’t want EU migrants to come here unless they have a job in advance.
But that just creates another bureaucratic barrier to EU migrants coming here at all. And in any event, the country already does choose which migrants to employ – the decision is made by British businesses, who want the right to choose their workforce from across our continent.
If an EU migrant can’t come here without having a job first, then chances are they will go to another country, and help their economy instead. That will be our loss.
EU regulations state that any EU citizen can move to another EU country to seek a job, so long as they have the means to look after themselves and don’t become a burden to the state. And what’s wrong with that? If they come here and don’t find a job, they usually go back home.
It’s a Daily Mail myth that migrants can simply come here and immediately start claiming benefits. It simply isn’t true.
The fact is that most migrants here have jobs; jobs that British businesses desperately need them to do. Britons shouldn’t complain – especially since more Britons are now in work than ever before. Migrants are not taking the jobs our unemployed could do. Migrants are coming here mostly to do the jobs that Britons can’t all do.
According to research published this week by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, as a result of Brexit, migration to the UK could fall by well over half from now to 2020. That would mean net EU migration falling by more than 100,000.
Such a drop in EU migration would also lead to a significant reduction in GDP per capita – up to 3.4% over the period to 2030, the NIESR has calculated. That would represent an economic downfall for Britain.
Britain needs EU migrants. They are not a threat; they are a boon. Our message to them should be, “Welcome, and thank you.”
Other stories by Jon Danzig:
- Brexit Secretary, David Davis, gets 5 stars for double standards
- 10 ways to stop Brexit
- The best EU trade deal? We already have it
- List of the latest articles by Jon Danzig
To follow my stories please like my Facebook page: Jon Danzig Writes
- The Reasons2Remain Facebook Community continues to support the case for Britain’s membership of the EU, and now, the actual impact of the Brexit vote. Join us!
- Join and share the discussion about this article on Facebook and Twitter:
— Reasons2Remain (@Reasons2Remain) 10 December 2016