The BBC call them migrants; the Prime Minister and some other media call them illegal; some Tory MPs and Nigel Farage call them ‘invaders’.
They are none of those. They are mostly desperate, destitute, stateless men, women and children fleeing from war, torture, oppression and persecution.
Nobody risks their lives across treacherous waters in unsuitable and unsafe boats unless they are deeply distressed and determined, with nothing left to lose.
Why don’t they seek asylum in the first safe country or countries they reach? Because it isn’t that simple. You may think it is, but it isn’t.
- For one thing, some countries don’t want them. They really don’t.
- For another, escaping from danger – genuine, terrifying, deadly danger – is just part of it.
Your country has been lost to you. The place you grew up, had family, memories, possessions, your home, your career. Now unsafe, maybe never safe to return.
You have to start again, either alone, or whoever you managed to bring with you.
Speaking English, having family already here, colonial links; all high on the list.
▪ THEY ARE NOT MIGRANTS; THEY ARE NOT ILLEGAL
Some politicians and media call refugees migrants. That’s entirely wrong.
- The term migrant means a person who moves from one place to another in order to find work or better living conditions. Migrants voluntarily leave their home countries for another and can voluntarily return home at any time.
That’s not the case for refugees.
- The term refugee means a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution or natural disaster. They have to leave their homes involuntarily and they cannot return.
Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, says those who get here illegally are illegal and will be treated accordingly. It’s beyond bloody nasty.
What other way is there for an asylum seeker to reach the UK unless by so-called illegal means?
Asylum can only usually be sought in the UK once in the UK. What a conundrum.
If the Prime Minister and the Home Secretary really cared about the plight, and safety, of desperate refugees (yes, most, but not all, are genuine refugees) then they would make the criminally induced hazardous journey across the English Channel entirely unnecessary.
The UK only takes a relatively low number of asylum seekers. We’re yet another so-called civilised country that doesn’t really want them.
If we wanted to help, we could allow refugees to apply for asylum without first having to endure a perilous voyage across the Channel to get here.
By making such a chancy crossing the only way to seek asylum here, the Prime Minister and Home Secretary are complicit in aiding and abetting odious gangsters who are making millions out of desolate people.
The language and actions of our current government are beyond despicable.
Like some of our media, they are advocating sheer hate against people who, in many cases, have been devastated as a direct result of our country’s violent interventions of their homes.
▪ SHAME ON BORIS JOHNSON
Let’s be clear. Refugees are innocent.
- Under international law – signed up to by the UK – there is no such entity as an illegal asylum seeker or refugee.
- Under international law – signed up to by the UK – it is accepted that asylum seekers may often need to use irregular and illegal routes and cross many borders before applying for asylum.
- Under international law – signed up to by the UK – there is no legal obligation for an asylum seeker to seek asylum or to stay in the first safe country they reach.
- Under international law – signed up to by the UK – there is an absolute obligation to accept and offer refuge to asylum seekers who have genuinely had to escape from war and danger in their home countries.
Yes, the UK does offer asylum to those in that category who make it to our shores. But only after ensuring that they must first endure the most terrifying journey to get here.
Shame on you Boris Johnson, Priti Patel and those other politicians and media who promote that it’s the asylum seekers who are acting illegally.
- Watch this 2-minute video on how asylum seekers are being called ‘illegal’
- Follow my journalism page on Facebook: Jon Danzig writes
- My campaign page on Facebook: Reasons2Rejoin
- And LinkedIn
- Share this article on Facebook: